‘Make it hypothetical’

What: Argue that you have analysed a useful hypothetical case, which is correct according to its assumptions

Use when: your analysis describes conditions that may not actually reflect reality, but are meaningful because they represent, for example, a typical or idealised situation that is of specific interest to the reader. For example, many hydro-economic models can either be thought to depend on specific assumptions about decision making (‘Define scope of applicability’) or as a benchmark of the ‘best’ outcome that can be achieved under idealised circumstances (‘Make it hypothetical’).

Why: Frames uncertainty in relation to reality as being irrelevant. When considering hypothetical situations, it is less important to consider uncertainty about whether results reflect the real world situation because results take on a meaning of their own. It is common practice to compare ‘what is’ with ‘what could be,’ and hypotheticals therefore have a useful role to play.

How to implement: Explicitly note that the results are not intended to reflect reality, and justify why looking at this hypothetical case is of interest.

How to recognise:

Qualifier indicate result is conditional on grounds. Grounds are described as hypothetical. Arguably, all scientific claims are actually conditional on the method used. They are, however, not necessarily framed as such. It needs to be sufficiently clear that the results are not intended to reflect reality.

Examples of Make-it-hypothetical, showing conditionality on hypothetical grounds (bold) for a primary claim (italics):

Patterns: Make-it-hypothetical (last edited 2016-08-19 13:30:07 by v861-64)